English / Français

Daughter did not Have Implied Consent of her Mother to Drive Her Car

Watts v. Bowman, 2016 ONSC 3994

Amanda Bowman was driving her mother’s car, when she struck a vehicle driven by the plaintiff Barbara Watts. The plaintiff suffered a broken wrist and started an action against Amanda her mother Christina Bowman.
Most of the facts were in dispute. The only issue was whether Amanda had the implied consent of her mother to drive the vehicle.

Under section 192 (2) of the Ontario Highway Traffic Act the owner of a car is liable for loss or damage caused by the vehicle unless it was being used without their consent.

Justice Corkery ruled that the question for consideration in this case was if all the circumstances were as such that Amanda had the implied consent of her mother to take the car. The burden of proving to the court that the vehicle was being driven without consent rests upon the owner.

On the day of the accident, Amanda arrived at her mother’s house not knowing if she could use the car. Her mother was asleep so she was unable to ask for permission. She took the car anyway assuming her mother would have allowed her to use the car.

Justice Corkery noted that Amanda had never previously taken her mother’s car without getting permission.

At trial, both mother and daughter testified that Amanda was required to ask for permission to use the car and to tell her mother where she was going. She also needed to tell her mother how long she would be gone and why she needed the car. Before 2008, Amanda testified that she lived with her mother and borrowed the car approximately five times. Between 2008 and 2011, she only took her mother’s car on two occasions.

The Court also noted that on some occasions Amanda asked for the car and her mother would have decided to drive her herself or simply refused to lend it.

Considering that Amanda’s mother had previously denied her consent to drive the car and considering both women agreed that Amanda had never taken the car without asking for permission, the Court concluded that the owner of the car, had demonstrated that Amanda did not have her implied consent to drive the car on the day of the accident.

You can read Watts v. Bowman, 2016 ONSC 3994, in its entirety here.

Related Posts