English / Français

Court Finds Plaintiff Not Credible, and Finds Injuries Pre-existing

Gale v. Purcell, 2018 NSSC 319

The Plaintiff, Angela Gale was a mother of two who worked as a dental assistant in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia. However, in 2006, due to a motor vehicle accident, Mrs. Gale suffered injuries to her left arm, which led to a change in career to a receptionist position at a dental clinic.

On March 23, 2010, the Plaintiff was in a second motor vehicle accident, where her vehicle was rear ended on the McKay Bride in Halifax.

The Defendant admitted that he negligently rear-ended the Plaintiff Gale’s vehicle. The Defendant however argued that any injuries that Mrs. Gale suffered were because of the motor vehicle accident from 2006 and/or had already been resolved.

In order to recover an amount for damages, the Plaintiff Gale needed to prove that on a balance of probabilities, the Defendant Purcell’s negligence caused or contributed to her injuries.

At trial, Plaintiff Gale testified that her 2006 accident had affected primarily her right arm, but that her 2010 accident had worsened her condition and severely aggravated her back and left arm pain.

The trial judge found that the Plaintiff was trying to distinguish the accidents by focusing on different areas of her body being affected and her evidence was seen as self-serving and was inconsistent with the medical records.

The trial judge noted that in her testimony, the Plaintiff had suggested that her inability to work as a dental assistant was related to the 2010 motor vehicle accident, despite the fact that she had not returned to work as a dental assistant following her 2006 accident.  The judge noted that this negatively affected her credibility.

The trial judge found that The Plaintiff Gale had not met her burden to prove that she suffered serious injuries as a result of the 2010 motor vehicle accident. The trial judge concluded it was more likely that the Plaintiff did not have lasting effects from the 2010 motor vehicle accident, as her condition at the trial of trial was essentially the same as it was prior to the 2010 motor vehicle accident.

The Court found that the Plaintiff’s injuries were limited by the Minor Personal Injury cap, and total damages were awarded of $12,500.

You can read Gale v. Purcell, 2018 NSSC 319, in its entirety here.

At Foster & Company, we represent institutions and individuals looking for help understanding insurance coverages and responding to claims. Contact us by phone at 506-462-4000 or reach us online for advice.

Related Posts